Can Polypharmacy Reduction Efforts in an Ambulatory Setting Be Successful?

Citation: 

Pages 33 - 35

Authors: 

Rhonda L. Randall, DO, and Stephen M. Bruno, PharmD

INTRODUCTION
Research has shown that for every dollar spent on pharmaceuticals, another dollar is spent to manage drug-related problems, costing Americans living in the United States approximately $104.2 billion annually.1-3 The elderly account for 12.7% of the U.S. population, but consume 34% of total prescription medication and 40% of all over-the-counter medicine.4-6 Inappropriate medication use may lead to increased health care services, including physician visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations.2 Polypharmacy (use of one or more unnecessary medications)7,8 in older adults is often caused by excessive duration of therapy.9,10 Physicians may be reluctant to discontinue potentially unnecessary medications, especially if they did not initiate the therapy, or if the patient requests therapy to be continued.7,11 Various authors have estimated that between 10% and 20% of hospitalizations among older adults result directly from adverse drug events.12-14

As part of the interdisciplinary team of a long-term care diversion provider, consultant pharmacists collaborate with geriatrician medical directors to review high-risk enrollee medication records. The long-term care diversion programs are designed for community-dwelling, frail elderly who are eligible for nursing home level of care but choose to remain living in the community. Enrollees are assisted by a dedicated care manager to form an individualized care plan that includes home- and community-based services with comprehensive coordination of medical, social, and behavioral health needs.

BACKGROUND
The authors wanted to evaluate the impact of consultant pharmacist collaboration with prescribers in the resolution of potential drug-related problems (DRPs) within Evercare community-based, long-term care programs (Figure). Over the course of 18 months, consultant pharmacists reviewed medication records in three Evercare sites in Florida, Arizona, and Massachusetts. A claims-based query tool identified patients at risk of DRPs, including unnecessary drug use, duplication of therapy, compliance, dosing, duration of therapy, drug-drug and drug-disease interactions, and Preferred Drug List (PDL) compliance. Faxes containing one or more recommendations were sent to prescribers. Returned responses were then tracked for prescriber agreement/disagreement.

Of the 982 medication records that were reviewed, 1191 potential DRPs were identified. Of the DRPs identified, 528 (44%) were for duration of therapy, 286 (24%) were for duplication of therapy, 163 (14%) were for dosing concerns, 107 (9%) were for drug-drug or drug-disease interaction, 102 (9%) were for missing appropriate indication, 54 (5%) were for nonpreferred (non-PDL), and 5 (1%) were for patient compliance issues. These reviews led to 1245 interventions containing one or more recommendations by the pharmacist.

The majority (1141 or 91%) were communicated to the prescribers in the form of faxes; 137 (11%) action plans were developed for the care manager to work with the enrollee, and 9 (1%) phone calls were made to prescribers. Of the 251 recommendations that were accepted, clinicians agreed to discontinue 241 (96%) of the medications; others agreed to switch to a different drug (3%) or change the dosing (2%). Using Beer’s criteria15 and clinical judgment, consultant pharmacists estimated that their interventions prevented serious DRPs in 21 (1%) of the cases reviewed.

DISCUSSION
Consistent with the current literature, the onsite geriatric consultant pharmacists found the four leading problematic medication classes to include gastrointestinal agents, analgesics, antipsychotics, and cardiovascular agents. Potential DRPs identified from these reviews included duration of therapy, duplication of therapy, inappropriate dosing, drug-drug or drug-disease interactions, and clinical indication issues.

References: 

REFERENCES

1. When Medicine Hurts Instead of Helps: Preventing Medication Problems in Older Persons. Washington, DC: Alliance for Aging Research; 1998.

2. Perry DP. When medicine hurts instead of helps. Consultant Pharmacist 1999;14:1326-1330.

3. Ernst FR, Grizzle AJ. Drug-related morbidity and mortality: Updating the cost-of-illness model. J Am Pharm Assoc 2001;41:192-199.

4. Families USA. Cost Overdose: Growth in Drug Spending for the Elderly, 1992-2010. Washington: Families USA; July 2000. Available at www.familiesusa.org/resources/newsroom/ archives/2000. Accessed April 27, 2006.

5. American Society of Consultant Pharmacists. Senior Care Pharmacy Facts. Available at: www.ascp.com/consumers/what/ seniorcarepharmacyfacts.cfm. Accessed April 28, 2006.

6. Hanlon JT, Fillenbaum GG, Ruby CM, et al. Epidemiology of over-the-counter drug use in community dwelling elderly: Unites States perspective. Drugs Aging 2001;18(2):123-131.

7. Stewart RB, Cooper JW. Polypharmacy in the aged. Practical solutions. Drugs Aging 1994;4:449-461.

8. Montamat SC, Cusack B. Overcoming problems with polypharmacy and drug misuse in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med 1992;8:143-158.

9. Cobbs EL, Duthie EH, Murphy JB, eds. Geriatrics Review Syllabus: A Core Curriculum in Geriatric Medicine. 4th ed. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, for the American Geriatrics Society; 1999.

10. Beers MH, Baran RW, Frenia K. Drugs and the elderly, Part 2: Strategies for improving prescribing in a managed care environment. Am J Manag Care 2001;7:69-72.

11. Rochon PA, Gurwitz JH. Drug therapy. Lancet 1995;346:32-36.

12. Beard K. Adverse reactions as a cause of hospital admission in the aged. Drugs Aging 1992;2:356-367.

13. Williams L, Lowenthal DT. Drug therapy in the elderly. South Med J 1992;85:127-131.

14. Tamblyn R. Medication use in seniors: Challenges and solutions. Therapie 1996;51:269-282.

15. Beers MH. Explicit criteria for determining potentially inappropriate medication use by the elderly. An update. Arch Intern Med 1997;157(14):1531-1536.